Legislature(2009 - 2010)CAPITOL 120

03/17/2010 01:00 PM House JUDICIARY


Download Mp3. <- Right click and save file as

* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ HB 287 UNIFORM ACT: PROPERTY INTEREST DISCLAIMER TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSHB 287(JUD) Out of Committee
+ HB 409 CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURES TELECONFERENCED
Heard & Held
*+ HB 386 CITATIONS TELECONFERENCED
Moved CSHB 386(JUD) Out of Committee
+ Bills Previously Heard/Scheduled TELECONFERENCED
       HB 287 - UNIFORM ACT: PROPERTY INTEREST DISCLAIMER                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
1:50:25 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR RAMRAS announced  that the next order of  business would be                                                               
HOUSE  BILL NO.  287, "An  Act relating  to the  adoption of  the                                                               
Uniform  Disclaimer  of  Property   Interests  Act,  and  to  the                                                               
disclaimer of property rights under the Uniform Probate Code."                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR  RAMRAS moved  to adopt  the proposed  committee substitute                                                               
(CS) for HB 287, Version  26-LS1300\E, Bannister, 3/17/10, as the                                                               
working  document.   There  being  no  objection, Version  E  was                                                               
before the committee.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
1:50:54 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE  GRUENBERG, speaking  as  a  joint prime  sponsor,                                                               
explained  that HB  287 addresses  one discrete  issue of  estate                                                               
planning in  which a  person who  is given an  estate asset  in a                                                               
will  or trust  may  wish to  skip (indisc.)  so  it's not  taxed                                                               
twice.   The aforementioned would save  a lot of money  in estate                                                               
taxes.   Currently, there is  one section of the  Uniform Probate                                                               
Code that  addresses the aforementioned,  but it has  become more                                                               
complicated  and sophisticated  since its  adoption in  the early                                                               
1970s.  Therefore,  the commissioners on uniform  state laws have                                                               
updated  it and  enacted  an entire  act on  this  matter.   This                                                               
legislation,  HB  287,  adopts  that  uniform  act,  after  being                                                               
"Alaskanized" by  trust attorneys  [in the  state].   He reminded                                                               
the committee  that when  former Representative  Gabrielle LeDoux                                                               
introduced legislation  addressing this  matter a few  years ago,                                                               
he was  concerned because it  didn't address back  child support.                                                               
The legislation  before the committee today  includes a provision                                                               
by which one can't escape paying  back child support.  He related                                                               
that after recent  discussions, one of the  Alaska provisions was                                                               
removed from  the legislation and  one of the  uniform provisions                                                               
was reinserted.  He said he hadn't heard of any objection to it.                                                                
                                                                                                                                
CHAIR RAMRAS, upon  determining no one wished  to testify, closed                                                               
public testimony.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
1:54:53 PM                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
REPRESENTATIVE DAHLSTROM  moved to report the  proposed committee                                                               
substitute  (CS)  for  HB 287,  Version  26-LS1300\E,  Bannister,                                                               
3/17/10,  out of  committee with  individual recommendations  and                                                               
the accompanying  fiscal notes.   There being no  objection, CSHB
287(JUD)  was   reported  from   the  House   Judiciary  Standing                                                               
Committee.                                                                                                                      

Document Name Date/Time Subjects
01 HB386 Sponsor Statement.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 386
02 HB386 Bill v. A.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 386
03 HB386 Overview.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 386
04 HB386-LAW-CRIM-03-12-10.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 386
05 HB386 Amendments 2010 03 15.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 386
01 HB409(STA) Sponsor Statement v. S.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 409
02 HB409 HSTA CS v. S.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 409
03 HB409(STA) v. S Sectional Analysis.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 409
04 HB409 Legal Memo for CS 409(STA).pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 409
05 HB409 AG Legal Analysis.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 409
06 HB409-1-1-031210-ADM-Y.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 409
07 HB409 NCSL states respond to Supreme Court ruling.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 409
08 HB409 news stories and opinions.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 409
09 HB0409-1-1-031210-ADM-Y.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 409
10 HB409 AARP ltr of support.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 409
11 HB409 Explaination of changes.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 409
12 HB409 HJUD Amendment S.4.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 409
13 HB409 HJUD Amendment S.5.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 409
14 HB409 HJUD Amendment S.7.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 409
15 HB409 HJUD Conceptual Amendment.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 409
16 HB409 HJUD Amendment S.2.pdf HJUD 3/17/2010 1:00:00 PM
HB 409